Seven Steps for Effective Problem Solving in the Workplace
Seven Steps for Effective Problem Solving in the Workplace
Individuals will in general complete three things when confronted with an issue: they get apprehensive or awkward and wish it would leave; they feel that they need to concoct an answer and it must be the correct answer, and they search for somebody to a fault. Being confronted with an issue turns into an issue. What's more, that is an issue because there are continually going to be issued!
There are two reasons why we will, in general, consider a to be as an issue: it must be explained and we don't know how to locate the best arrangement, and there will likely be clashes about what the best arrangement is. The vast majority of us will, in general, be "strife disinclined". We don't feel good managing strife and we will, in general, incline that something terrible will occur. The objective of a decent critical thinking process is to make us and our association more "clash benevolent" and "strife capable".
There are two significant things to recollect about issues and clashes: they happen constantly and they are chances to improve the framework and the connections. They are furnishing us with data that we can use to fix what necessities fixing and make a superior showing. Taken a gander at right now, can nearly start to invite issues! (All things considered, nearly.)
Since individuals are conceived issue solvers, the greatest test is to defeat the inclination to quickly think of an answer. Let me state that once more. The most widely recognized error in critical thinking is attempting to discover an answer immediately. That is an error since it attempts to put the arrangement toward the start of the procedure when what we need is an answer toward the finish of the procedure.
Here are seven-strides for a successful critical thinking process.
1. Recognize the issues.
Be clear about what the issue is.
Recall that various individuals may have various perspectives on what the issues are.
Separate the posting of issues from the distinguishing proof of interests (that is the subsequent stage!).
2. Comprehend everybody's inclinations.
This is a basic advance that is typically absent.
Interests are the requirements that you need to be happy with some random arrangement. We frequently overlook our actual advantages as we become joined to one specific arrangement.
The best arrangement is the one that fulfills everybody's inclinations.
This is the ideal opportunity for undivided attention. Put down your disparities for some time and hear each out other to comprehend.
Separate the naming of interests from the posting of arrangements.
3. Rundown the potential arrangements (alternatives)
This is an ideal opportunity to do some conceptualizing. There might be bunches of space for inventiveness.
Separate the posting of alternatives from the assessment of the choices.
4. Assess the alternatives.
What are the pluses and minuses? Genuinely!
Separate the assessment of choices from the determination of alternatives.
5. Select a choice or choices.
What's the best choice, in a critical position?
Is there an approach to "group" a few choices together for a progressively palatable arrangement?
6. Archive the agreement(s).
Try not to depend on memory.
Recording it will assist you with thoroughly considering all the subtleties and suggestions.
7. Concede to possibilities, observing, and assessment.
Conditions may change. Settle on possibility understandings about not so distant conditions (If-at that point!).
In what manner will you screen consistency and finish?
Make chances to assess the understandings and their execution. ("We should attempt it along these lines for a quarter of a year and afterward take a gander at it.")
Viable critical thinking takes some time and consideration a greater amount of the last than the previous. Be that as it may, less time and consideration than is required by an issue not all around unraveled. The stuff is an ability to back off. An issue resembles a bend in the street. Take it right and you'll end up fit as a fiddle for the straightaway that follows. Take it excessively quick and you may not be fit as a fiddle.
Working through this procedure isn't constantly a carefully straight exercise. You may need to cycle back to a prior advance. For instance, in case you're experiencing difficulty choosing an alternative, you may need to return to pondering the interests.
This procedure can be utilized in a huge gathering, between two individuals, or by one individual who is confronted with a troublesome choice. The more troublesome and significant the issue, the more accommodating and vital it is to utilize a restrained procedure. In case you're simply attempting to choose where to go out for lunch, you presumably don't have to experience these seven stages!
0 commentaires:
Enregistrer un commentaire
Abonnement Publier les commentaires [Atom]
<< Accueil